题目内容
Iran is reacting to the increasing pain of economic sanctions. Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is urging greater efficiency and motivation, and Iran’s vice president is threatening to stop doing business in dollars and euros. As new U.S. and U.N. economic sanctions step up the pressure on Iran’s economy, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is urging his countrymen to change their habits. Fars News Agency reports that Ayatollah wants Iranians to work harder，use more initiative and be more creative. Top Iranian vice president Mohammad Reza Rahimi also told journalists Friday that the government was planning to stop selling oil in euros and dollars. Iran has threatened to stop selling oil in dollars, before, but with limited success. It was the first time that Tehran has threatened to stop using the Euro.The European Union ambassadors, meeting in Brussels, agreed Thursday to a new package of sanctions targeting Iran’s energy sector. The sanctions must be approved Monday at a meeting of EU foreign ministers. The U.N. and U.S. imposed fresh sanctions on Iran, last month, to force it to stop enriching uranium for its controversial nuclear program. Why is the Iran’s Supreme Leader urging his countrymen to work harder().
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
To begin with, we are witnessing a (32) explosion of "solos" — people who live (33) , outside a family altogether. Between 1970 and 1978, the number of persons aged fourteen (34) thirty-four who lived alone nearly tripled in the United State — (35) from 1.5 million to 4.3 million. Today, (36) fifth of all households in the United States consists (37) a living solo. (38) are all these people losers or loners, forced into the solo life. Many deliberately choose it, at least for a time. Says a legislative aide to a Seattle councilwoman, "I (39) consider marriage if the right person came (40) , but I would not give up my career (41) it." Looking at an older slice of the population, we find a large number of formerly married people, living on their (42) and, in many eases, decidedly liking it. The growth of such groups (43) created a flourishing "singles" culture and a much publicized proliferation of bars, travel tours, and (44) services or products de- signed for the independent individual. Simultaneously, the real estate industry has come (45) with "singles only" condominia, and has begun to respond to a (46) for smaller apartments and suburban homes with fewer bedrooms. We are now experiencing a growth (47) the number of people living together (48) bothering about legal formalities. This group has more (49) doubled in the past decade. The practice has become so common that the US Department of Housing and Urban Development has overthrown tradition and (50) its rules to permit such couples to occupy public housing. The courts are wrestling (51) the legal and property complications that spring up when such couples "divorce".
Imagine you found out that ideas invented by a computer were rated higher by independent experts than ideas created by a group of humans asked to perform the same task. Would you praise the designer of the "creative computer" for a great achievement or would you question why human talent -- usually so potent in coping with complex cognitive challenges -- created such poor ideas Or maybe you would question your view of the notion of creativity. In fact, such a scenario was played out when we used a simple computerized routine to generate ideas and compared them as superior to human ideas when they performed the same taskCreativity is considered the ultimate human activity, a highly complex process, difficult to formalize and to control. Although there is a general agreement regarding the distinctive nature of the creative product( idea, painting, poem, and so on). there is a controversy over the nature of the creative process. Some researchers hold that the creative thinking process is qualitatively different from "ordinary" day-to-day thinking, and involves a leap that cannot be formulated, analyzed, or reconstructed --the creative spark. Others adopt a reductionism view that creative products and the outcome of ordinary thinking, only quantitatively different from everyday thinking.Because creative ideas are different from those that normally arise, people often believe that such ideas require conditions dramatically different from the usual. The notion goes that, in order to overcome mental barriers and reach creative idem, total freedom is necessary -- no directional guidance, constraints, criticism, of thinking within bounded scope. Then ideas can be drawn and contemplated from an infinite space during the creativity process. This view prompted the emergence of various idea-generating methods: brainstorming, synectics, lateral thinking, random stimulation, and so on, all of which consist of withholding judgement and relying on analogies from other members in the group of on randomly selected analogies. This family of methods relies on the assumption that enhancing randomness, breaking roles and paradigms, and generating anarchy of thought increase the probability of creative idea emergence.Do these methods work A number of researchers indicate that they do not. Ideas suggested by individuals working a- lone are superior to ideas suggested in brainstorming sessions and the performance of problem solvers instructed to "break the rules, get out of the square, and change paradigms" was not better than that of individuals who were not given any instruction at all.The failure of these methods to improve creative outcomes has been explained by the unstructured nature of the task. Reitman observed that many problems that lack a structuring framework are ill-defined in that the representations of one or more of the basic components -- the initial state, the operators and constraints, and the goal -- are seriously incomplete, and the search space is exceedingly large. Indeed, many ill-defined problems seem difficult, not because we are swamped by the enormous number of alternative possibilities, but because we have trouble thinking even of one idea worth pursuing. According to this passage, ideas invented by a computer ().
You might think they would have learned their lesson by now. At the end of 2005 Republicans in the House of Representatives passed a bill that cracked down on illegal immigration, while doing nothing to regularise the position of the 12m or so people, mostly of Hispanic origin, who were living and working inside the United States without the proper papers, or to create a mechanism for allowing in people from Mexico and other southern neighbours to work with temporary permits. The bill never became law, but its one-sided nature helped stamp the Republicans (92% of whom voted for it in the House) as an anti-immigrant party. In April 2006 Latinos organised a day of protests in more than 100 cities; more than 500,000 people marched in Los Angeles alone. In the 2008 election 67% of Hispanics voted for Barack Obama.Now it is all happening again. Until now, the detection of illegal immigrants has invariably been a matter for the federal authorities.Republican-governed Arizona has just enacted a tough new law of its own: it requires state police to check the papers of anyone whose immigration status they have "reasonable" cause to doubt. Opponents say this is sure to lead to racial profiling. The bill is popular with angry white locals, so much so that the previously reform-minded John McCain, who is running for re-election to the Senate in Arizona, has not dared to oppose it. But in a country that is turning Hispanic at a rapid rate (by mid-century white Anglos will be another minority), the Republicans are once again hellbent on being on the wrong side of demography. The backlash will surely last longer than any bump in popularity gained by looking tough. The marches have begun again: on May 1st, up to a million people across the country took to the streets, by no means all of them Hispanic.For those who yearn for America to have a sensible immigration policy, the Arizona bill is a reason for both despair and hope. The first is easier to spell out. By any measure, Arizona’s offering is deeply illiberal. It would require all non-U. S. citizens to carry documents proving their immigration status, and would require police to check those papers in any contact with anyone who might be illegal. The obvious danger is that it would lead to the systematic harassment of brown-skinned people, including legal immigrants. As for illegals, it would simply drive even more of them underground. It would also criminalise anyone who shelters or helps illegals. Even the plan’s fans acknowledge that this is the toughest such bill ever passed in America.Paradoxically, the reason for hope is much the same. The bill is such a shocker that it is restarting the national debate. The Arizona law passed largely because the government is failing to do its job. The border is not secure; employers can and do hire people who have no legal right to be in America; and cross-border crime is on the rise. Better enforcement is needed. But on both political and moral grounds, better enforcement can only he part of a comprehensive immigration reform. The 12m illegals cannot be wished away, but must be given a chance to earn their citizenship; a guest-worker programme is needed to match the demands of employers with the desire of Mexicans and others to work. Mr. Obama’s administration has talked a lot about an immigration bill. It is now long past time that they produced one. Otherwise, expect to see more Arizonas. According to the passage, the author()Republicans’ move on illegal immigration.
已知IN2.DAT中存有200个4位数，并已调用读函数readDat()把这些数存入数组a中，请编制一函数jsVal()，其功能是：依次从数组a中取出一个数，如果该4位数连续大于该4位数以后的5个数且该数是奇数，则统计出满足此条件的数的个数cnt，并把这些4位数按从小到大的顺序存入数组b中，最后调用写函数writeDat()把结果ent及数组b中符合条件的4位数输出到OUT2.DAT文件中。 注意：部分源程序已给出。 程序中定义数组：a[200]，b[200],已定义变量：cnt。 请勿改动主函数main()、读函数readDat()和写函数writeDat()的内容。 试题程序： #include＜stdio.h＞ #define MAX 200 int a[MAX],b[MAX],cnt=0; void writeDat(); void jsVal() void readDat() int i; FILE *fp; fp=fopen("IN2.DAT","r"); for(i=0;i＜MAX;i++) fseanf(fp,"%d",&a[i]); fclose(fp); void main() int i; readDat(); jsVal(); printf("满足条件的数=%d\n",cnt); for(i=0;i＜cnt;i++)printf("%d",b[i]); printf("\n"); writeDat(); void writeDat() FILE *fp; int i; rp=fopen("OUT2.DAt","w"); fprintf(fp,"%d\n",cnt); for(i=0;i＜cnt;i++)fprintf(fp,"%d\n",b[i]); fclose(fp);
微信支付 
支付宝支付