Our hypothesis is that immigrants, who often do not speak the language and do not master the culture and norms of the host country, are concentrated in more manual-routine tasks (especially among less educated groups). The inflow of immigrants thus increases the supply of manual skills relative to the supply of abstract skills with two effects: ● Due to the complementarity between these types of skills, the increase in the supply of manual tasks boosts relative compensation for complex skills, making them better paid. ● Exploiting their comparative advantage, natives move to occupations requiring a relatively higher level of these skills. This positive reallocation and the complementarity of tasks can explain the lack of negative employment effects as well as the potential positive wage effects of immigration on native workers. So here"s how it all shakes out. Low-skilled immigration reduces economic inequality when we set aside nationalist assumptions and focus on people instead of populations. Even if we cling to analytical and moral nationalism, low-skilled immigration doesn"t happen to increase measured inequality. On the contrary, complementaries between the skills of migrant and native workers can leave natives better off than they would have been with less immigration. 注释： (1)hypothesis n. 假设 (2)account for动词短语固定搭配，解释……的原因 (3)positive a. 积极的/正面的negative a. 消极的/反面的 (4)host a. 主人，主持host country在文中指移民寄居国 (5)boost v. 向上推，推起 (6)reallocation n. 重新分配allocate v. 分配，配给 allocation n. 前缀re-，有“重新、再”的意思 (7)complementarity n. 互补性 complementary a. (8) ...than they would have been with less immigration. would have+过去分词，表示对过去发生动作或状态的可能性推测的虚拟用法