2010年,黑龙江省全年完成全社会固定资产投资6812.6亿元,比上年增长35.5%。其中,城镇投资6292.7亿元,增长34.0%。在城镇投资中,民间投资3035.3亿元,增长52.4%;国有及国有控股投资3093.6亿元,增长19.2%;外商及港澳台投资163.8亿元,增长49.3%。装备、石化、能源、食品等四大主导产业完成投资2077.1亿元,增长37.6%,占城镇工业投资的75.9%。亿元以上建设项目1157个,比上年增加266个,完成投资2878.3亿元,增长33.8%。2010年,黑龙江省全年实现社会消费品零售总额4001.0亿元,比上年增长19.0%。按地域分,城镇零售额3547.7亿元,增长17.0%;农村零售额453.3亿元。从行业看,批发业零售额497.1亿元,增长21.4%;零售业零售额3012亿元,增长18.6%;住宿业零售额41.7亿元,增长18.6%;餐饮业零售额450.7亿元,增长19.1%。2010年,在限额以上批发零售贸易业24类产品中,其零售额均呈现增长态势,其中,建筑及装潢材料类增长1.2倍,五金、电料类增长63.3%,文化办公用品增长58.3%,家具类增长42.5%,石油及制品类增长40.1%,日用品类增长39.5%,家用电器和音像器材类增长33.1%,金银珠宝类增长31.3%,汽车类增长28.8%,食品、饮料、烟酒类增长27.1%,服装鞋帽、针纺织品类增长23.3%。 2010年,黑龙江省社会消费品零售总额中,增加量最大的行业的增加量是增加量最小的行业的几倍()
A. 72.2
B. 21.6
C. 13.4
D. 6.5
2010年,黑龙江省全年完成全社会固定资产投资6812.6亿元,比上年增长35.5%。其中,城镇投资6292.7亿元,增长34.0%。在城镇投资中,民间投资3035.3亿元,增长52.4%;国有及国有控股投资3093.6亿元,增长19.2%;外商及港澳台投资163.8亿元,增长49.3%。装备、石化、能源、食品等四大主导产业完成投资2077.1亿元,增长37.6%,占城镇工业投资的75.9%。亿元以上建设项目1157个,比上年增加266个,完成投资2878.3亿元,增长33.8%。2010年,黑龙江省全年实现社会消费品零售总额4001.0亿元,比上年增长19.0%。按地域分,城镇零售额3547.7亿元,增长17.0%;农村零售额453.3亿元。从行业看,批发业零售额497.1亿元,增长21.4%;零售业零售额3012亿元,增长18.6%;住宿业零售额41.7亿元,增长18.6%;餐饮业零售额450.7亿元,增长19.1%。2010年,在限额以上批发零售贸易业24类产品中,其零售额均呈现增长态势,其中,建筑及装潢材料类增长1.2倍,五金、电料类增长63.3%,文化办公用品增长58.3%,家具类增长42.5%,石油及制品类增长40.1%,日用品类增长39.5%,家用电器和音像器材类增长33.1%,金银珠宝类增长31.3%,汽车类增长28.8%,食品、饮料、烟酒类增长27.1%,服装鞋帽、针纺织品类增长23.3%。 2010年,黑龙江省社会消费品零售额中,农村零售额同比增长()。
A. 21.0%
B. 27.8%
C. 37.4%
D. 34.7%
Euthanasia can be either active or passive: (46) Active euthanasia means that a physician or other medical personnel take a deliberate action that will induce death, such as administering an overdose of morphine, insulin , or barbiturates, followed by an injection of curare. Passive euthanasia means letting a patient die for lack of treatment, or suspending treatment that has begun. Examples of passive euthanasia include taking patient off a respirator (a breathing apparatus) or removing other life -support systems. Stopping the food supply--usually intravenous feeding to comatose patients--has also been used.A good deal of the controversy about mercy killing stems from the decision - making process. Who decides if a patient is to die This issue has not been established legally. (47) In the United States the matter is left to state law, which usually allows the physician in charge to suggest the option of death to a patient’ s relatives, especially if the patient is brain - dead. In an attempt to make decisions about when their own lives should end, several terminally iii patients in the early 1990s used a controversial suicide device , developed by Dr. Jack Kevorkian, to end their lives.In parts of Europe, the decision - making process has become very flexible. (48) Even in cases that are not terminal, patients have been put to death without their consent at the request of relatives or at the insistence of physicians. Many capes of involuntary euthanasia in valve older people. Newborn infants suffering from incurable conditions are also routinely allowed to die. The principle underlying this practice is that such individuals have a concept that "life not worthy of life". This concept was devised in Germany during the Nazi regime (1933 -45) , when numerous killings of the aged, mentally iii, handicapped, and others were authorized by the state.In countries where involuntary euthanasia is not .legal , the court systems have proved very lenient in dealing with medical personnel who practice it. (49) Courts have also been somewhat lenient with friends or relatives who have assisted terminally iii patients to die or who have, in some cases ,killed them directly.Medical advances in recent decades have made it possible to keep terminally ill people alive far beyond any hope of recovery or improvement. For this reason the "living will" has come into common use in the United States as part of the right - to - die principle. (50) Most states now legally allow the making of such wills that instruct hospitals and physicians to suspend treatment in hopeless cases or to re fuse futile life - support measures when chances of recovery are nonexistent.The 20th - century euthanasia movement began in England in 1935, with the founding of the Voluntary Euthanasia Legislation Society. In the United States the Society for the Right to Die was founded in 1938. Even in cases that are not terminal, patients have been put to death without their consent at the request of relatives or at the insistence of physicians
Euthanasia can be either active or passive: (46) Active euthanasia means that a physician or other medical personnel take a deliberate action that will induce death, such as administering an overdose of morphine, insulin , or barbiturates, followed by an injection of curare. Passive euthanasia means letting a patient die for lack of treatment, or suspending treatment that has begun. Examples of passive euthanasia include taking patient off a respirator (a breathing apparatus) or removing other life -support systems. Stopping the food supply--usually intravenous feeding to comatose patients--has also been used.A good deal of the controversy about mercy killing stems from the decision - making process. Who decides if a patient is to die This issue has not been established legally. (47) In the United States the matter is left to state law, which usually allows the physician in charge to suggest the option of death to a patient’ s relatives, especially if the patient is brain - dead. In an attempt to make decisions about when their own lives should end, several terminally iii patients in the early 1990s used a controversial suicide device , developed by Dr. Jack Kevorkian, to end their lives.In parts of Europe, the decision - making process has become very flexible. (48) Even in cases that are not terminal, patients have been put to death without their consent at the request of relatives or at the insistence of physicians. Many capes of involuntary euthanasia in valve older people. Newborn infants suffering from incurable conditions are also routinely allowed to die. The principle underlying this practice is that such individuals have a concept that "life not worthy of life". This concept was devised in Germany during the Nazi regime (1933 -45) , when numerous killings of the aged, mentally iii, handicapped, and others were authorized by the state.In countries where involuntary euthanasia is not .legal , the court systems have proved very lenient in dealing with medical personnel who practice it. (49) Courts have also been somewhat lenient with friends or relatives who have assisted terminally iii patients to die or who have, in some cases ,killed them directly.Medical advances in recent decades have made it possible to keep terminally ill people alive far beyond any hope of recovery or improvement. For this reason the "living will" has come into common use in the United States as part of the right - to - die principle. (50) Most states now legally allow the making of such wills that instruct hospitals and physicians to suspend treatment in hopeless cases or to re fuse futile life - support measures when chances of recovery are nonexistent.The 20th - century euthanasia movement began in England in 1935, with the founding of the Voluntary Euthanasia Legislation Society. In the United States the Society for the Right to Die was founded in 1938. Most states now legally allow the making of such wills that instruct hospitals and physicians to suspend treatment in hopeless cases or to re fuse futile life - support measures when chances of recovery are nonexistent.