题目内容
More than three-quarters of the children we interviewed said they’re sometimes afraid to be home alone. If you decide your child is (67) enough to be home alone before or (68) school, you should make sure your house is (69) and teach your child to (70) various situations. Make a game of your instructions. Have your child answer questions beginning with "What would you do if" and ending with phrases like "you lost your key" (71) "someone you don’t know comes (72) the door." The best home security is (73) . Every home should have smoke detectors, but consider also installing a burglar-alarm system. Leaving a radio (74) during the day makes a home sound (75) . Besides, as one child said, "It’s horrifying walking into a quiet house." Don’t leave an extra key in obvious hiding places, such as under the doormat. (76) it with a neighbor instead. (77) your child is home alone, the phone is a vital (78) . A parent or designated (指定的) adult should always be available by (79) . Children should know where to find (80) numbers, and how to (81) the phone and take a message without letting an unknown caller (82) no one else is home. You might (83) a telephone-answering machine. Your child (84) then be able to pick up the receiver only when he heard a (85) voice. If you help your child understand the precautions you’ve taken, he will feel more (86) about staying home.
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
Although the job applicants have not finished high school, they are highly likely to be promoted.
Passage OneQuestions 57 to 61 are based on the following passage. Research on friendship has established a number of facts, some interesting, some even useful. Did you know that the average student has 5-6 friends, or that a friend who has previously an enemy is liked more than one who has always been on the right side Would you believe that physically attractive individuals are preferred as friends to those less comely, and is it fair that physically attractive defendants are less likely to be found guilty in court Unfortunately, such facts don’t tell us much more about the nature or the purpose of friendship. In fact, studies of friendship seem to implicate more complex factors. For example, one function friendship seems to fulfill is that it supports the image we have of ourselves, and confirms the value of the attitudes we hold. Certainly we appear to project ourselves onto our friends; several studies have shown that we judge them to be more like us than they objectively are. This suggests that we ought to choose friends who are similar to us rather than those who would be complementary. In our experiment, some developing friendships were monitored amongst first-year students living in the same hostel. It was found that similarity of attitudes towards politics, religion and ethics, pastimes and aesthetics was a good prediction of what friendships would be established by the end of four months. There have also been studies of pairings, both voluntary (married couples) or forced (student roommates), to see which remained together and Which split up. Again, the evidence seems to favor similarity as an sign of a successful relationship, though there is an exception: where marriage is concerned, once the field has been narrowed down to potential mates who come from similar backgrounds and share a broad range of attitudes and values, a degree of complementarity (互补) seems to become desirable. Similarity can breed contempt; it has also been found that when we find others offensive, we dislike them more if they are like us than when they are dissimilar. The difficulty of linking friendship with similarity of personality probably reflects the complexity of our personalities: we have many sides and therefore require a different group of friends to support us. This of course can explain why we may have two close friends who have little in common, and indeed dislike each other. By and large, though, it looks as though we would do well to choose friends (and spouses) who resemble us. If this were not so, computer dating agencies would have gone out of business years ago. When we are too similar to other people, ______.
证券市场供给的主体是企业。( )
Passage TwoQuestions 62 to 66 are based on the following passage. The newspaper must provide for the reader the facts, pure, objective facts. But in these days of complex news it must provide more; it must supply interpretation, the meaning of the facts. This is the most important assignment confronting American journalism—to make clear to the reader the problems of the day, to make international news as understandable as community news, to recognize that there is no longer any such thing as "local" news, because any event in the international area has a local reaction in manpower floating, in economic pressure, in terms, indeed, of our very way of life. There is in journalism a widespread view that when you embark on interpretation, you are entering dangerous waters, the swirling tides of opinion. This is nonsense. The opponents of interpretation insist that the writer and the editor shall confine himself to the "facts". This insistence raises two questions: What are the facts And: Are the bare facts enough As to the first question, consider how a so-called "factual" story comes about. The reporter collects, say, fifty facts; out of these fifty, his space being necessarily restricted, he selects the ten which he considers most important. This is Judgment Number One. Then he or his editor decides which of these ten facts shall constitute the lead of the piece. (This is important because many readers do not proceed beyond the first paragraph.) This is Judgments Number Two. Then the editor determines whether the article shall be presented on page one, where it has larger impact, or on page twenty-four, where it has little. Judgment Number Three. Thus, in the presentation of a so-called "factual" or "objective" story, at least three judgments are involved. And they are judgments not at all unlike those involved interpretation, in which reporter and editor, calling upon their research resources, their general background, and their "news neutralism," arrive at a conclusion as to the significance of the news. The two areas of judgment, presentation of the news and its interpretation, are both objective rather than subjective processes—as objective, that is, as any human being can be. (Even though complete objectivity can never be achieved, nevertheless the ideal must always be ultimate goal.) If an editor is intent on slanting the news, he can do it in other ways and more effectively than by interpretation. He can do it by the selection of those facts that prop up his particular plea. Or he can do it by the play he gives a story-promoting it to page one or dragging it to page thirty. What is the author’s attitude toward the interpretation of news
微信支付 
支付宝支付