题目内容
根据下面的文字资料回答下面问题。 改革开放以来，我国民营经济始终处于高速发展状态。截止2001年底，我国民营企业已达202.85万户，比上年同期增加26.68万户，其中城镇民营企业达129.12万户，增长 19.64%；农村民营企业73.73万户，增长8.01%。2001年底，民营企业的从业人员为 2713.86万人，比上年同期增加307.87万人，增长12.77%，其中投资者人数460.83万人，增加65.49万人，增长16.56%，雇工人数2253.03万人，增加241.88万人，增长 12.03%。注册资本18212.24亿元，比上年同期增加4904.55亿元，增长36.86%。 2001年，新开业民营企业达52.94万户，比上年同期增加8.12万户，增长18.12%；从业人员622.47万人，比上年同期增加71.63万人，增长13%，其中投资者人数118.56万人，增长10.66%，雇工人数503.91万人，增长13.57%；注册资金4796.90亿元，比上年同期增加1338.82亿元，增长38.72%。 从各省份看，民营企业户数最多的是江苏省22.55万户，其次是广东省21.1万户，浙江省20.88万户，上海市17.64万户，山东省14.47万户，北京市12.41万户，以上6省市共有109.05万户，占民营企业总户数的53.76%。从地区分布情况看，东部地区共有民营企业138.79万户，占民营企业总户数的68.42%，比上年减少0.04个百分点； 中部地区民营企业36.02万户，占民营企业总户数的17.76%，比上年减少0.38个百分点；西部地区民营企业28.05万户，占民营企业总户数的13.83%，比上年增加0.42个百分点。 2001年，中国民营企业共创产值12816.99亿元，比上年同期增加1577.21亿元，增长 14.69%；实现销售总额11484.24亿元，比上年增加1600.18亿元，增长16.19Z；社会消费品零售额6245亿元，比上年增加431.52亿元，增长7.42%。从资本占用、从业人数和产出总量等方面来看，私营个体经济在国民经济中的份额大体在10-20%之间，已经成为国民经济中一个不可忽视的重要组成部分。 2000年开业的民营企业吸收的雇工人数约为( )。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
31（）
请在以下程序第一行的下划线处填写适当内容，使程序能正确运行。 (double, double); main() double x, y; scanf("% lf % lf", &x, &y); printf("% 1f\\n", max(x, y)); double max(double a, double b) return(a＞b a:b);
针对一段资料一般有1～5个问题，应试者需要根据资料所提供的信息进行分析、比较、计算，从四个备选答案中选出符合题意的答案。根据下面统计表，回答下面问题。 2007年1、2月份居民消费价格指数以上年同期价格为100指标名称全国城市农村2月1-2月2月1-2月2月1-2月居民消费价格指数102.7102.4102.5102.2103.2102.9(一)食品类106.0105.5105.5105.0107.2106.7 粮食106.8106.9106.7106.7107.0107.1 肉禽及其制品115.4114.5115.3114.3115.4114.7 蛋126.7122.8128.2124.2124.1120.5 水产品103.4101.7103.0101.4104.0102.5 鲜菜89.688.988.988.491.590.2 鲜果107.8106.3107.4105.8108.6107.4(二)烟酒及用品101.8101.7101.9101.8101.6101.4(三)衣着100.2100.3100.0100.2100.8100.7(四)家庭设备用品及服务102.2102.1102.1102.0102.2102.2(五)医疗保健及个人用品101.4101.3101.1101.0102.0101.9(六)交通和通信99.699.699.199.0100.8101.0(七)娱乐教育文化用品及服务99.298.599.999.197.997.3(八)居住103.7103.7103.6103.8103.8103.8 下列推论不正确的是( )。
When, in the age of automation, man searches for a worker to do the tedious, unpleasant jobs that are more or less impossible to mechanize, he may very profitably consider the ape. If we tackled the problem of breeding for brains with as much enthusiasm as we devote to breeding dogs of surrealistic shapes, we could eventually produce assorted models of useful primates, ranging in size from the gorilla down to the baboon, each adapted to a special kind of work. It is not putting too much strain on the imagination to assume that geneticists could produce a super-ape, which is able to understand some scores of words and capable of being trained for such jobs as picking fruit, cleaning up the litter in parks, shining shoes, collecting garbage, doing household chores and even baby-sitting, although I have known some babies I would not care to trust with a valuable ape. Apes could do many jobs, such as cleaning streets and the more repetitive types of agricultural work, without supervision, though they might need protection from those egregious specimens of Home sapiens who think it amusing to tease or bully anything they consider lower on the evolutionary ladder. For other tasks, such as delivering papers and laboring on the docks, our man-ape would have to work under human overseers; and, incidentally, I would love to see the finale of the twenty-first century version of On the Waterfront in which the honest but hairy hero will drum on his chest after literally--taking the wicked labor leader apart. Once a supply of nonhuman workers becomes available, a whole range of low IQ jobs could be thankfully given up by mankind, to its great mental and physical advantage. What is more, one of the problems which has annoyed so many fictional Utopias would be avoided: There would be none of the degradingly subhuman Epsilons of Huxley’s Brave Nero World to act as a permanent reproach to society, for there is a profound moral difference between breeding sub-men and super-apes, though the end products are much the same. The first would introduce a form of slavery, but the second would be a biological triumph which could benefit both men and animals. The author of this article is
微信支付 
支付宝支付