针对有人提出的在革命成功后应采取什么措施的问题,马克思尖锐地指出,问题“提得不正确”。“现在提出这个问题是不着边际的,因而实际上是一个幻想的问题,对这个问题的唯一的答复应当是对问题本身的批判。”因为“在将来某个特定的时刻应该做些什么,应该马上做些什么,这当然完全取决于人们将不得不在其中活动的那个既定的历史环境”。可见,马克思主义经典作家______
A. 没有提出预见未来社会的科学方法
B. 立足于揭示未来社会的一般特征,而不作详尽的细节描绘
C. 通过剖析资本主义社会旧世界详尽地阐发了未来新世界的特点
D. 在揭示人类社会发展一般规律的基础上指明了社会发展的细节
One Good Reason to Let Smallpox Live It’s now a fair bet that we will never see the total extinction of the smallpox virus. The idea was to cap the glorious achievement of 1980, when smallpox was eradicated in the wild, by destroying the killer virus in the last two labs that are supposed to have it-one in the US and one in Russia. If smallpox had truly gone from the planet, what point was there in keeping these reserves (51) reality, of course, it was naive to (52) that everyone would let (53) of such a potent potential weapon. 1 Undoubtedly several nations still have (54) vials. (55) the last "official" stocks of live virus bred mistrust of the US and Russia, (56) no obvious gain. Now American researchers have (57) an animal model of the human disease, opening the (58) for tests on new treatments and vaccines. So one again there’s a good reason to (59) the virus-just in (60) the disease puts in a reappearance. How do we (61) with the mistrust of the US and Russia (62) Keep the virus (63) international auspices in a well-guarded UN laboratory that’s open to all countries. The US will object, of course, just as it rejects a multilateral approach to just about everything. But it doesn’t (64) the idea is wrong. If the virus (65) useful, the let’s make it the servant of all humanity—not just a part of it.
A. will be
B. would be
C. is
D. are
One Good Reason to Let Smallpox Live It’s now a fair bet that we will never see the total extinction of the smallpox virus. The idea was to cap the glorious achievement of 1980, when smallpox was eradicated in the wild, by destroying the killer virus in the last two labs that are supposed to have it-one in the US and one in Russia. If smallpox had truly gone from the planet, what point was there in keeping these reserves (51) reality, of course, it was naive to (52) that everyone would let (53) of such a potent potential weapon. 1 Undoubtedly several nations still have (54) vials. (55) the last "official" stocks of live virus bred mistrust of the US and Russia, (56) no obvious gain. Now American researchers have (57) an animal model of the human disease, opening the (58) for tests on new treatments and vaccines. So one again there’s a good reason to (59) the virus-just in (60) the disease puts in a reappearance. How do we (61) with the mistrust of the US and Russia (62) Keep the virus (63) international auspices in a well-guarded UN laboratory that’s open to all countries. The US will object, of course, just as it rejects a multilateral approach to just about everything. But it doesn’t (64) the idea is wrong. If the virus (65) useful, the let’s make it the servant of all humanity—not just a part of it.
A. looked for
B. sought
C. found
D. talked about
One Good Reason to Let Smallpox Live It’s now a fair bet that we will never see the total extinction of the smallpox virus. The idea was to cap the glorious achievement of 1980, when smallpox was eradicated in the wild, by destroying the killer virus in the last two labs that are supposed to have it-one in the US and one in Russia. If smallpox had truly gone from the planet, what point was there in keeping these reserves (51) reality, of course, it was naive to (52) that everyone would let (53) of such a potent potential weapon. 1 Undoubtedly several nations still have (54) vials. (55) the last "official" stocks of live virus bred mistrust of the US and Russia, (56) no obvious gain. Now American researchers have (57) an animal model of the human disease, opening the (58) for tests on new treatments and vaccines. So one again there’s a good reason to (59) the virus-just in (60) the disease puts in a reappearance. How do we (61) with the mistrust of the US and Russia (62) Keep the virus (63) international auspices in a well-guarded UN laboratory that’s open to all countries. The US will object, of course, just as it rejects a multilateral approach to just about everything. But it doesn’t (64) the idea is wrong. If the virus (65) useful, the let’s make it the servant of all humanity—not just a part of it.
A. handle
B. tackle
C. deal
D. treat